Skip to How it Works
v2.0 Now Live

Stop Agonizing.
Start Deciding.

Analysis paralysis costs you time and peace of mind. Prism uses a weighted 3-point matrix (Logic, Emotion, Expertise) to solve your dilemmas in under 2 minutes.

48,000+

decisions analyzed

1m 42s

average time to clarity

4.8/5

average confidence after review

Used by founders, students, and managers

I finally chose between two offers in one sitting instead of dragging it out for weeks.

Product Founder

Prism helped me separate anxiety from evidence before committing to grad school.

MBA Student

We now run major team decisions through Prism first and argue less afterwards.

Operations Manager
The Methodology

Meet Your Council

Prism doesn't just flip a coin. It assigns three distinct AI personas to debate your dilemma from different angles.

Data Architect

The Logical Judge

Runs a cold-weighted pass over every claim you enter, stress-tests assumptions, and highlights where your scoring quietly contradicts your stated priorities.

  • Separates measurable outcomes from gut reactions so your ranking stays evidence-first.
  • Flags inconsistent weighting (for example, saying growth matters most but scoring lifestyle factors higher).
  • Produces an explainable trail so you can defend the decision to yourself and others.
Goal: Reveal your hidden preferences

Future Self Guardian

The Emotional Judge

Models emotional aftershocks before they happen: burnout risk, confidence dips, and regret patterns tied to each option over the next weeks and months.

  • Checks whether your decision matches your energy, relationships, and identity needs.
  • Treats anxiety as signal, not noise, then distinguishes short-term fear from long-term misalignment.
  • Surfaces the choice you can live with peacefully when the initial excitement wears off.
Goal: Protect your happiness

Red-Team Critic

The External Expert

Imports outside perspective from proven frameworks, prior case patterns, and a deliberately skeptical critic that hunts blind spots in your narrative.

  • Challenges overconfidence by asking what a ruthless advisor would attack first.
  • Injects practical heuristics so your decision is benchmarked against real-world outcomes.
  • Converts vague risk into concrete scenarios and mitigation plans.
Goal: Apply external wisdom
LIVE PREVIEW

Build your case in seconds

A compact simulation of someone entering pros, cons, and neutral facts.

Build Your Case Simulation

Watch a user structure evidence before running the verdict

Auto-playing preview

Step 1

Open Build Your Case

Prompt: Should I relocate for a new leadership role?

Step 2

Add multiple pros

Higher pay, faster growth, and stronger mentorship.

Step 3

Capture cons

Higher rent, family distance, and adaptation stress.

Step 4

Log neutral facts

Team size, start date, and hybrid schedule details.

Case builder input

Auto-simulated typing

Added 6 entries: 2 pros, 2 cons, 2 neutral facts. Ready to analyze.

Pro

Comp package +28% with annual bonus

Pro

Direct path to director scope within 12 months

Con

Monthly living costs expected to rise by ~35%

Con

Commute adds 50 minutes on office days

Neutral

Hybrid policy is 3 days in office, 2 remote

Neutral

Offer decision deadline is March 14

Simulation checkpoint

Case balanced · Ready for verdict

Pros, cons, and neutral facts are all captured before scoring.

The Dilemma

"Should I accept the Senior Manager role in New York?"

Consensus Recommendation
Accept Offer
Confidence Score: 92%
📐

Logical Judge (85/100)

"The salary increase (+40%) outweighs the cost of living adjustment based on your financial goals."

❤️

Emotional Judge (92/100)

"You indicated high regret if you miss this opportunity. Fear of relocation is temporary."

🧠

External Expert (70/100)

"Market conditions favor this move, though New York's competitive pace is a burnout risk."

Decision Matrix Visualization

Why is deciding so hard?

Your brain isn't wired to calculate hundreds of probabilities at once. Under uncertainty, we default to shortcuts that feel safe in the moment but lead to confusion later.

These six traps quietly drive indecision and make clear choices feel impossible.

🌀

Overthinking

Getting stuck in endless "what if" scenarios that feel productive but never move you forward.

⚖️

Bias Blindness

Leaning on temporary emotions and hidden assumptions instead of balanced evidence.

😰

Fear of Regret

Avoiding decisions because one wrong move feels bigger than all the possible upside.

📉

Decision Fatigue

After too many choices, mental energy drops and even simple calls start feeling heavy.

🔍

Analysis Paralysis

Collecting more and more data without a framework, waiting for impossible certainty.

🧲

Social Pressure

Prioritizing outside expectations over your actual goals, values, and long-term needs.

What can Prism solve?

Career Moves
Real Estate
Relationships
Investments
Hiring
Travel
Education
Conflicts

Frequently Asked Questions